Talk:Races

Poor Editing
It is like poor editing to have each race subheading in a different format. It would make more sense to just have each race as its own article. -unsigned comment by 2601:2c4:c481:5c40:7d55:3d5f:6282:39cb 21:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Well that's just, like, your opinion, man. Nothing has really changed since the last community discussion about this, so the page will not change in this regard. Good job finding the new wiki though. ;) -Decanter (talk | contribs) 20:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't know if new articles would be necessary (even though the topics are certainly long enough), but I certainly agree that there should be some consistency among subheadings and article quotes. Wikipedia has some pretty well defined editing rules if that helps. Wikipedia:Consistency -unsigned comment by 2601:2c4:c481:5c40:e1be:b2d:31bd:23af 16:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Come off it, BH. We know it's you. You don't get to re-argue the same tired points just because it's a rehosted wiki, and logging out and changing your IPv6 address isn't clever. Also, it's not impressive to cite Wikipedia protocol on an unrelated wiki when you can't even be bothered to sign your comments as protocol dictates.


 * For anyone else reading, quick restatement of the admins' position from old discussion pages: Article length is not a major concern due to being able to jump to headings, most of the sections aren't long enough to merit their own article, and they certainly aren't long enough to deserve four subheadings each when many of those subheadings would have just a sentence or two. Until all these things change, splitting up the Races page isn't on the table. -Decanter (talk | contribs) 08:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC)